Corrections

We correct errors rather than delete content. If you find a factual inaccuracy in any reference page or article on thestandingarmy, we will amend the text and add a correction note. This note appears at the foot of the relevant section or article, stating what was corrected and the date of the change. This process ensures transparency and maintains a reliable record of information for all readers.

A substantive correction is required for an error of fact that changes the meaning of the content. This includes incorrect dates, specifications, budgetary figures, institutional structures, or descriptions of operational roles. Minor typographical errors, grammatical fixes, or formatting adjustments that do not alter factual meaning are made without a published note.

To report an error, please provide the full web address of the article and quote the exact claim you believe is incorrect. If possible, include a citation to an authoritative source that shows the accurate information. This allows for a precise and efficient review. We aim to investigate and implement any necessary corrections within two working days of receiving a clear report.

Some facts on thestandingarmy are inherently subject to change, such as defence budget allocations, equipment programme milestones, or the status of territorial disputes. When the world changes, such as a new government altering a procurement plan, we update our reference pages accordingly. These updates are not corrections but routine maintenance; a note will be added only if the previous version of our page contained a factual error about the prior state of affairs.

Our focus is on the armed force, its equipment programme, and its role in the state for a LatAm audience. We build reference pages on armed forces, programmes, country profiles, equipment, institutions, and deployments. Accuracy in these areas is paramount, and this corrections policy is designed to uphold that standard.